Petitioner withdrawn a petition for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The High Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 238 of 2023
Decided on: 10.10.2023
Jogi Ram .…Petitioner. Versus The KCC Bank Ltd. …Respondent. Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
These proceedings are against the order
passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, District Shimla, H.P., whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of delay in
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
filing of the appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been dismissed.
Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakshan Pvt. Ltd. (2016) SCC Online H.P. 53, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has held that in such like circumstances, the remedy of regular second appeal will be available to the person and he cannot approach the Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy in accordance with law. Prayer being innocuous is allowed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jyotsna Industrial Training Centre Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakshan Pvt. Ltd.Referred¶15
(2016) SCC Online H.P. 53 · Who else cites this
Jogi Ram
The KCC Bank Ltd.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
