Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition for pleadings defect. High Court dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after proper pleadings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 4949/2023 Decided on: 13.09.2023 Dharmi Devi ...…petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …… respondents ……………………………………………………………………………….. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition suffers from pleadings defect. Some pertinent facts have not been mentioned in the petition. For these reasons, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings after incorporating all grounds available to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with leave and liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 13th September 2023 (Rohit)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Dharmi Devi
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
