The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition without examining merits, directing respondents to consider the petitioner's case in light of cited judgments within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.4395 of 2023
Decided on: 13th September, 2023
_________________________________________________________________ Gopal Dass ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram_
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua,
1 Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Anupam Anzranni Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, & Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta Additional Advocates General, Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocates General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Heard.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision
dated 15.07.2010, rendered in LPA No. 36 of 2010(Sita
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Ram Vs. State of H.P. & Ors) and Paras Ram Vs. State of H.P. and another) Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 887 . Learned
counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgments. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
4. Having regard to above submissions and without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgments and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
September 13, 2023 R.Atal
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sita Ram Vs. State of H.P. & OrsReferred¶14
LPA No. 36 of 2010
Paras Ram Vs. State of H.P. and anotherReferred¶17
Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 887
Gopal Dass
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
