Two writ petitions filed by Harbans Chand and Mulkh Raj against the State of H.P. were dismissed as they were withdrawn by the petitioners' counsel during arguments. Pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of.
Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 3293/2022 & CWP No.3294/2022 Decided on: 13.09.2023
CWP No.3293/2022 Harbans Chand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ....Respondents.
CWP No.3294/2022 Mulkh Raj …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ....Respondents.
……………………………………………………………………………… Coram
Ms Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. Rakesh K. Dogra, Advocate, in both the petitions. For the respondents. : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State
Mr. Chitranjan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents/Accountant General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is
under instructions to withdraw the present petitions. Accordingly,
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 13th September, 2023 (rohit)
Harbans Chand
Mulkh Raj
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
