The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of a writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari and mandamus regarding rejection from a post selection. The relief was found infructuous.
All reliefs claimed regarding screening test are disposed of as the petitioner was permitted to sit in the test.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 459 of 2023 Decided on: 13.03.2023
_________________________________________________ Madhu Sudhan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors
....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …Respondents ______________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
___________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.S. Guleria Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
The instant petition has been filed for grant of the
following substantive reliefs:-
“i) Issue writ of certiorari to quash Annexure P-1 i.e. impugned rejection list qua the petitioner who is figured at Sr. No. 172. ii) Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to allow the petitioner in selection process for the post of
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
Emergency Operation Centre Inchargecum-Documentation Coordinator, ClassII (Non-Gazetted) in the Department of Revenue, H.P. iii) Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to allow the petitioner to appear in the screening test or personal interview.
dated 10.03.2023, which would go to indicate that the third respondent has permitted the petitioner to sit in the screening test.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh)
Judge
13th March, 2023
(himani)
Madhu Sudhan Singh
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
