Brief order regarding an application for early hearing in a criminal miscellaneous petition and a case petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The court dismissed the early hearing application and listed the other matter.
Application for early hearing dismissed; other case listed with two-week deadline to file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Harmeek Singh & Ors vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP-T No. 52 of 2023
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents –State.
CMP-T No. 52 of 2023
Since the respondents are yet to file reply,
therefore, the application for early hearing is misconceived and dismissed at this stage.
CWPOA 6992 of 2020
Despite the passage of more than four and half
years, reply has not been filed. Let needful be done within two weeks, failing which right to file reply shall be deemed to be closed by the order of the Court.
List on 24th March, 2023.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh) Judge
10th March, 2023
(himani)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harmeek Singh & Ors.
State of H.P. & Ors.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
