Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, finding that Respondent No.3 had permitted the petitioner to sit in the screening test, rendering the claim for a writ of mandamus unnecessary.
Petition disposed of as infructuous due to permission granted for screening test.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 257 of 2023 Decided on: 13.03.2023
_________________________________________________ Madhu Sudhan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …Respondents ______________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
___________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.S. Guleria Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer.
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
The instant petition has been filed for grant of the
following substantive reliefs:-
“i) Issue writ of certiorari to quash Annexure P-1 i.e. impugned rejection list qua the petitioner who is figured at Sr. No. 124. ii) Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to allow the petitioner in selection process for the post of Training and Capacity Building
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
Coordinator, Class-II (Non-Gazetted) in the Department of Revenue, H.P. iii) Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to allow the petitioner to appear in the screening test or personal interview.
dated 10.03.2023, which would go to indicate that the third respondent has permitted the petitioner to sit in the screening test.
same relief has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh)
Judge
13th March, 2023 (himani)
Madhu Sudhan Singh
State of H.P.
Respondent No.3
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
