Kamal Kant Thakur v. Hrtc and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner states grievances are redressed; petition and pending applications disposed of without disposal outcome or legal principle.
Petitioner states grievances are redressed; petition and pending applications disposed of without disposal outcome or legal principle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 4357 of 2022
Decided on : 14.3.2023
Kamal Kant Thakur
…Petitioner
Versus
HRTC & others
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Mr. Parv Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent(s) : Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate.
Per Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the
grievances of the petitioner stand redressed. Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of. The pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Virender Singh) Judge
March 14, 2023 Kalpana
2
Kamal Kant Thakur
HRTC
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court