Petitioners withdrew the writ petition as the sale notice was withdrawn and cancelled. The Court disposed of the petition and pending applications as withdrawn.
Disposal of the writ petition and all pending applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3835 of 2023.
Date of decision: 15.06.2023.
M/s Renny Steels Village Kunjal and another
…..Petitioners.
Versus
Reserve Bank of India and others
…..Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioners : Mr. Shriyek Sharda, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3/P.N.B. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. I.N. Mehta, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondents/State.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is
under instructions to withdraw this petition since his clients have
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2
informed that the sale notice stands withdrawn and cancelled and
the OTS has been referred to by the bank.
of the petition and would simply dispose of this writ petition as
withdrawn, so also the all pending applications.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
15th June, 2023. ( krt )
M/s Renny Steels Village Kunjal and another
Reserve Bank of India and others
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
