Vijay Kumar v. State of Hp and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Vs State of HP & anr. CWP No. 3424 of 2023…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Vijay Kumar Vs State of HP & anr.
CWP No. 3424 of 2023
14.7.2023 Present:Mr. Mukul Sood,Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. I.N.Mehta and Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondentsState.
Learned counsel for the respondents-State fairly states that the order in question stands fully complied with inasmuch as the petitioner has been transferred and posted one of the stations of his choice, therefore, no further order is required to be passed. Hence, the matter is closed.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge 14th July, 2023 (Guleria)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/3424/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court