Petitioner was adjusted to a station of his choice as per an office order dated 24.6.2023, leading the High Court to close the writ petition without passing further orders.
Petition closed; no further orders required as petitioner was adjusted to a station of his choice via office order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mohinder Singh vs. State of H.P. & another
CWP No. 3398 of 2023
13.7.2023
Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. I. N. Mehta & Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.Gs., Ramakant Sharma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.Gs and Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Dy. A.G. for the respondents.
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 6.7.2023 along with office order dated 24.6.2023, whereby,
the petitioner has been suitably adjusted at one of the station of his choice.
In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed and the matter is closed.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
13th July, 2023 (kck)
Mohinder Singh
State of H.P.
another
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
