Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage; the Court granted this prayer.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 1931 of 2023
Date of decision : 9.8.2023. RAkesh Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Rahul Thakur, DAG.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, reserving liberty as aforesaid.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
9th August, 2023 (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
RAkesh Kumar
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
