Disposed
Vikas Chaudhary v. Rajiv Aggarwal
Himachal Pradesh HCCOPC/121/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 121 of 2022
Date of decision : 8.8.2023. Vikas Chaudhary ...Petitioner. Versus Rajiv Aggarwal ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge . Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance with the directions issued by this Court, the opportunity was afforded to the petitioner for reengagement but he has not come forward.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
be issued by this Court and the matter is closed and is
accordingly disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 8th August, 2023. Judge
(kck
Vikas Chaudhary
Rajiv Aggarwal
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court