Kali Dass v. Shobha Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
Vs. Shobha Ram and ors. CWP No. 1108 of 2017…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kali Dass Vs. Shobha Ram and ors.
CWP No. 1108 of 2017
08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 26.
Mr. I.N. Mehta, Sr. Additional Advocate General, with Mr. J.S. Guleria and Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate Generals, for respondent No.27.
CMP(M) No. 1589 of 2023
Notice. Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate, waive service of
notice on behalf of proposed legal representative of deceased respondent No.1. Learned counsel appearing for the proposed legal representatives has not objected the allowance of the application, accordingly, the same is allowed. The legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 1, as detailed in para-4 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record as respondents No. 1(a) to 1( d) with one amendment that the name of respondent No. 1(d) be mentioned and read as ‘Veena Devi’ instead of ‘Leela Kumari’. Amended memo of parties be filed accordingly. Application stands disposed of.
CWP No. 1108 of 2017
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP.M/1589/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court