Petitioner sought and was allowed permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition; matter was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 2954 of 2023.
Decided on : 1st December, 2023.
Rohit
...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. ... .Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Dy. A.G.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 1st December, 2023. (jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rohit
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
