The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, dismissed the petition accordingly.
petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.6132 of 2020
Decided on: 19th December, 2022
Rajinder Kumar …..Petitioner
Versus
The State of H.P. and others .....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Ritta Goswami, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Assistant Advocate General.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The petition is
accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 19, 2022 Judge Mukesh
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order?
Rajinder Kumar
The State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
