Petitioner sought permission to withdraw Ex. Pet. No. 83 of 2017 on November 1, 2017. The Court granted permission, dismissing the petition and reserving liberty to initiate proceedings if required.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.83 of 2017 Date of decision: 01.11.2017
Rajat Kumar ..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & another …Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner: Mr.Devender K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.M.A. Khan and Mr.V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate Generals.
________________________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law, if so required and desired. Permission granted. Liberty reserved.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdraw, with liberty as prayed for, alongwith pending application(s), if any.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
November 1, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ) (vt) Judge
Rajat Kumar
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
