Disposed
Sports Authority of India v. Balkar Singh
Himachal Pradesh HCCMP.M/2099/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.2099 of 2016 and CMP No.10089 of 2016 in…
What the court decided
AI extract
No.2099 of 2016 and CMP No.10089 of 2016 in…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No.2099 of 2016 and CMP No.10089 of 2016 in CWP No.10039 of 2012
Ms.Tim Saran, Advocate, for respondent No.1. CMP(M) No.2099 of 2016 and CMP No.10089 of 2016
For the reasons set out in the application (CMP(M) No.2099 of 2016), the same is allowed and the delay of nine months and four days in filing the application (CMP No.10089 of 2016), which in our considered view has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. Application is allowed and the order dated 23rd December, 2015, is recalled. The writ petition is restored to its original number and position. Applications stand disposed of accordingly.
CWP No.10039 of 2012
List for hearing on its turn.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
November 1, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ) (vt) Judge
Applicants
Respondent No.1
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court