Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one; liberty was granted and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to withdraw petition and file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 2445 of 2017 Date of Decision: 01.11.2017
____ Rajinder Singh …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. ....Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge . Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Ms. Mamta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. M.A. Khan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals.
Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions,
seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to file afresh on the same and subsequent cause of action, if so required and desired. Liberty granted. As such, present petition stands disposed of as having been withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly
( Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice 1st November, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ), Manjit Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rajinder Singh
State of H.P. and Ors.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
