Disposed
Om Prakash v. Hrtc
Himachal Pradesh HCEX.P./82/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 82 of 2017 Date of decision: 4th October, 2017 Om Parkash Petitioner Versus H.R.T.C. and another Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting1 :
For the appellant : Ms. Anita vice Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate ______________________________________________________ Per Sanjay Karol, A.C.J. (Oral)
Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents,
states that a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- (five lacs approximately) stands already released in favour of the present petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of intervening developments, petitioner does not press the present petition, reserving liberty to take recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in accordance with law.
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
1 Whether Reporters of local newspaper are permitted to see the judgment ?
Om Parkash
H.R.T.C.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court