Disposition of a writ petition not pressed on the ground that the impugned judgment has been complied with; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.64 of 2017 Date of decision: 21.09.2017
Amita Rani ..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner: Mr.Vikas Rajput, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.Anup Rattan, Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
________________________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Mr.Vikas Rajput, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that he does not press the present petition, for the reason that the judgment, in question, stands complied with.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed alongwith pending application(s), if any.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
September 20, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ) (vt) Judge
Amita Rani
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
