Petitioner declared the present petition infructuous due to intervening developments. The petition was disposed of accordingly along with any pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.54 of 2017 Date of decision: 15.06.2017
Jai Dev ..Petitioner
Versus Himachal Pradesh Forest Corporation & another . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner:
Mr.C.N. Singh, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Surender K. Sharma, Advocate.
________________________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in
view of intervening developments, present petition has become infructuous. Disposed of, as such, alongwith pending applications, if any.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
June 15, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ) (vt) Judge
Jai Dev
Himachal Pradesh Forest Corporation
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
