Petitioners sought to withdraw the present CWP petition with liberty to file afresh on the same and subsequent cause of action. The Court granted permission and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, also disposing of pending applications.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 307 of 2017 Date of Decision: 15.6.2017
Balak Ram Dhiman and Anr. …..Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. ….Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma & Mr. Kush Sharma, Deputy Advocate Generals.
Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral)
In view of the subsequent developments, learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh on the same and subsequent cause of action. State has no objection. Liberty granted. As such, present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
( Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice 15th June, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ), Manjit Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Balak Ram Dhiman and Anr.
State of H.P. and Ors.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
