A Civil Writ Petition was disposed of without hearing on merits. The Court granted liberty to file a representation, directing the competent authority to consider it within two months after affording a hearing opportunity.
Direction issued to the competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1244 of 201 6 Decided on: June 14, 2017 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------M/s Hi-Tech Industries …………….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……….Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan and Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral):
Without pressing the petition on merits, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that petitioner shall be content if it is permitted to file a representation, within four weeks from today, before the competent authority venting out its grievances. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to the same.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? .
2
authority shall expeditiously consider and decide the same, in accordance with law.
Copy dasti.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
June 14, 2017 (vikrant)
M/s Hi-Tech Industries
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
