Kailasho Devi v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
161 of 2016 12.06.2017 Present: Mr. Vijay…
What did the court decide?
No order to be passed as the order is stated to be complied with.
161 of 2016 12.06.2017 Present: Mr. Vijay…
No order to be passed as the order is stated to be complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ex. Pet. No. 161 of 2016
12.06.2017 Present: Mr. Vijay Bhatia, counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, ASGI, with Mr. Nipun Sharma, counsel for the U.O.I.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the State.
Mr. Vijay Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner,
states that order stands complied with. As such, no order is required
to be passed.
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
June 12, 2017(K) ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ), Judge
Petitioner
Union of India
State
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court