Amar Nath v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Order condoning 51-day delay in filing a review petition and registering it.
What did the court decide?
Review petition registered; application disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No. 186 of 2017
12.06.2017 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, counsel for the applicants/petitioners.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
CMP(M) No. 186 of 2017
For the reasons set out in the application, delay of 51
days’ in filing the review petition, which in our considered view has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. The review petition be registered. The application stands disposed of.
Rev. Pet. No._______of 2017.
List for hearing on 31st July, 2017
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
June 12, 2017(K) ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ), Judge
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP.M/186/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court