Dismissed
Chandu Ram v. Padam Dev
Himachal Pradesh HCCOPC/52/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 52 of 2017 Date of Decision: May 29, 2017
Chandhu Ram …Petitioner. Versus Padam Dev ...Respondent. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner: Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the Respondent: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Advocate vice Mr.Pankaj Thakur, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral).
We find that directions contained in judgment dated 22.06.2016, passed by this Court in CMPMO No. 227 of 2016, titled as Chandu Ram Versus Babu Ram and another, to have been fully complied with, as is so stated by Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned counsel, vice Mr.Pankaj Thakur, Advocate.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
such remedies, as are provided in law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice.
May 29, 2017 (Tarlok Singh Chauhan), (Purohit) Judge.
Chandhu Ram
Padam Dev
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court