Petitioner withdrew the writ petition after compromising the matter with Respondent No. 5. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 40 of 2017 Decided on: 10.10.2017
| Fujikawa Power Workers Union | …Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| State of H.P. & Ors. | ...Respondents |
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner: Mr. Rahul Singh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Dy.A.G, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. None for respondent No. 4. Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for respondent No. 5.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Mr. Rahul Singh Verma, learned Advocate for the
petitioner, states that he has instructions to withdraw this petition as the petitioner has compromised the matter with respondent No. 5. His statement is taken on record.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan),
October 10, 2017
sanjeev
Judge.
Fujikawa Power Workers Union
State of H.P.
Respondent No. 5
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
