The petitioner was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. The judgment was disposed of as withdrawn accordingly along with any pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1282 of 2017 Date of decision: 26th July, 2017 Dr. Parveen Bhatia ..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ..Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting1 :
For the Petitioner : Ms. Rashmi Parmar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________________ Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission granted.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn accordingly as also pending applications, if any.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
( Sandeep Sharma ) 26th July, 2017(K) Judge
1 Whether Reporters of local newspaper are permitted to see the judgment ?
Dr. Parveen Bhatia
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
