This order disposes of a writ petition by directing the government to expedite a pending inquiry against a suspended public servant, completing it within six weeks after seeking a copy of this judgment.
Direction to respondent No.6 to complete the inquiry within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.1179 of 2017 Date of decision: 20.07.2017
Thakar Singh ..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & others . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr.Surender Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.Anup Rattan and Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, for respondents No.1 to 7.
Mr.Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.8.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Mr.Surender Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, rightly points out that with the suspension of private respondent No.8 Dinesh Kumar and the regular inquiry having been initiated, no further orders, at this stage, are necessarily required to be passed, save and except that the inquiry be expedited. Respondents have no objection to the same.
2
of hearing to all concerned, within a period of six weeks from
the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s)
disposed of.
Copy dasti .
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
July 20, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ) (vt) Judge
Thakar Singh
State of H.P.
Dinesh Kumar
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
