State of Hp v. Ajeet Kumar and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2017 with Ex. Petition No. 36 of 2017…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No. 911 of 2017 with Ex. Petition No. 36 of 2017
- 26.7.2017 Present Mr. M.A. Khan and Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocates General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the applicant in CMP(M) No. 971 of 2017 and for the respondents in Ex. Petition No. 36 of 2017.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondent in CMP(M) No. 971 of 2017 and for the petitioner in Ex. Petition No. 36 of 2017 and for Caveator in Caveat Petition No. 362 of 2017.
Caveat Petition No. 362 of 2017 Disposed of.
CMP(M) No. 911 of 2017
For the reasons stated in the application, same is
allowed. Delay of 259 days in filing the accompanying appeal, which in our considered view is sufficiently explained, is condoned. Application is disposed of. Appeal be registered.
LPA No. ________of 2017
Admit.
Issue post-admission notice. Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP.M/911/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court