Writ petition dismissed as not pressed since the petitioner had subsequently been gainfully employed.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 6620 of 2012 Decided on: 17.10.2017.
Dr. Murari Lal Thakur …Petitioner.
Versus
Central University of H.P. and another ..Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1
For the Petitioner : Mr. Malkiat Singh Chandel, Advocate, vice Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, ASGI, with Ms. Sukarma, Advocate.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge ( Oral )
Mr. Malkiat Singh Chandel, learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he has instructions not to press the petition as the petitioner has subsequently been gainfully employed. His statement is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, so also the pending application(s), if any.
17th October, 2017. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan), (GR) Judge
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?
Dr. Murari Lal Thakur
Central University of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
