Budhi Singh v. Hari Singh

• Criminal Revision No. of 2017.

12.05.2017 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Narender Kumar Reddy, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Pramod Thakur, Addl. A.G. for respondent No.2.

Cr. MP (M) No. 504 of 2017 .

Having gone through the contents and the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that the delay of 33 days as occurred in filing the main appeal is neither intentional nor deliberate and rather stands satisfactorily explained. Being so, this application is allowed and the delay as occurred in filing the main appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

Cr. Revision No. of 2017 .

Admit .

Cr.MP No. 408 of 2017

Learned counsel is permitted to correct the provisions of law under which this application is filed, under his signatures and date.

The petitioner is a convict. He has been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and also to pay `1,70,000/as compensation by learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Chachiot at Gohar, vide judgment dated 14^th /17^th July, 2014 passed in complaint No.69I/2013/ 134-III/2013. Learned lower appellate Court in Criminal Appeal No.22/15/2014 (40/14), while upholding