The judgment consists of short procedural orders allowing lead to appeals, admitting an application, issuing bailable warrants, and dismissing an application as infructuous. No operative reasoning or legal proposition is articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr. Appeal No. of 2017.
11.05.2017 Present: Mr. Pramod Thakur, Addl. A.G. for the appellant-applicant.
Cr. MP (M) No. 201 of 2017.
Heard. Leave to appeal is granted. Let
the appeal be registered. The application stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No. _______of 2017.
Admit .
Bailable warrants in the sum of `25,000/-
with one surety in the like amount be issued to the respondent-accused for 14th July, 2017 .
Cr. MP No. 166 of 2017.
Since the certified copy of the trial Court
Judgment now stands filed, therefore, this application has turned infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
