The petitioner withdrew its case as not pressed due to intervening developments. The Court dismissed the petition but reserved liberty for the petitioner to challenge the order of consideration filed by the respondent.
Petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to assail the order of consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC No. 252 of 2017 Decided on: October 25, 2017
| -------------------------------------- M/s ram Krishan Saini and Comp V |
------- any ersus |
--------------------------- ……………. |
---------- Petitioner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tarun Shridhar and others -------------------------------------- |
------- |
….Res --------------------------- |
pondents ---------- |
Coram |
|||
| Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karo Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sha Whether approved for reporting? -------------------------------------- |
l, Acti rma, ------- |
ng Chief Justice Judge --------------------------- |
---------- |
For the petitioner Mr. Pran |
B.C. ay Pra |
Negi, Senior Advocate tap Singh, Advocate. |
with Mr. |
| For the respondents Mr. Mr. Add |
Shraw M.A. itional |
an Dogra, Advocate Gen Khan and Mr. Romesh Advocates General and |
eral with Verma, Mr. J.K. |
| Ver Adv --------------------------------------- Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justi |
ma an ocates ------- ce (ora |
d Mr. Kush Sharma, General. --------------------------- l): |
Deputy --------- |
Vide judgment dated 21.6.2017 passed in CWP No. 1347 of 2017 titled M/s Ram Krishan Saini and Company versus State of H.P. and Ors. , this Court directed the respondent-State to consider petitioner’s request within a period of four weeks. Today, Mr. J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record order of consideration dated 31.7.2017.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
October 25, 2017 (vikrant)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? .
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present petition pressing for consideration by the Court should be dismissed.
Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to appeal the order of consideration.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s Ram Krishan Saini and Company versus State of H.P. and Ors.Referred¶4
CWP No. 1347 of 2017
M/s Ram Krishan Saini and Company
Tarun Shridhar and others
Sanjay Karo
Sandeep Sha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
