Disposed
Darshan Dass v. State
Himachal Pradesh HCEX.P./92/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.92 of 2017
Date of Decision: October 12, 2017
Shri Darshan Dass …Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & another ...Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. B.N.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
For the Respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with M/s Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate General and J.K.Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral).
Mr. J.K.Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that order of consideration stands passed. Copy whereof, stands supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
the petitioner to take recourse to such remedies, as may be desired and advised.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice.
October 12, 2017 (Purohit)
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge.
Shri Darshan Dass
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court