Petitioner sought review of a contempt order held to have been complied with. The court held the act was not contemptuous, disposed of the petition, discharged the contempt notice, and reserved liberty for alternative remedies.
Petition disposed of; notice of contempt discharged; liberty reserved for alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 135 of 2017
Date of decision: 27th July, 2017
Madan Lal Petitioner Versus Dr. Adithela Jai Vara Prasad Respondent __________________________________________________ Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting1 :
For the Petitioners: Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Kush Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. __________________________________________________ Per Sanjay Karol , A.C.J. (Oral) We find, the directions contained in the judgment,
dated 31st March, 2016 in CWP No. 2849 of 2015, titled Madan Lal Vs. State of H.P. and others to have been complied with by the respondents authorities, with the consideration of
the petitioner’s case and passing of order, (Annexure R-1). As
1 Whether Reporters of local newspaper are permitted to see the judgment ?
2
such, act of the respondent cannot be said to be contemptuous and we dispose of the present petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available, in accordance with law. We clarify that we also discharge the notice of contempt.
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
July 27, 2017(K) ( Sandeep Sharma ), Judge
Madan Lal
Dr. Adithela Jai Vara Prasad
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
