Disposed
Rekha v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCMP.M/981/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
981 of 2017 & CMP No.6077 of 2017 in CWP No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
981 of 2017 & CMP No.6077 of 2017 in CWP No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.M No. 981 of 2017 & CMP No.6077 of 2017 in CWP No. 596 of 2017
24.08.2017 Present: Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
[
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma & Mr. Kush Sharma, Deputy Advocate Generals, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP.M No. 981 of 2017
For the reasons set out in the application, delay
in filing the application being CMP No. 6077 of 2017, which in
my considered view, has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.6077 of 2017
For the reasons so assigned in the application,
the same is allowed and Writ Petition is restored to its original
number and position. The application stands disposed of.
CWP No. 596 of 2017
List on 5.10.2017 .
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
Manjit
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court