State of Hp v. Mahanti Devi and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
No. 703 of 2017 23.08.2017 Present: Mr.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No. 703 of 2017
- 23.08.2017 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan and Mr. Romesh Verma, Addl. AGs and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for the appellant/applicant.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 2/non-applicant/UOI.
CMP(M) No. 703 of 2017
As per office report, respondent No. 1 stands served.
Despite repeated calls and pass-overs, none has entered appearance on her behalf. Hence proceeded against ex parte.
For the reasons set out in the application, delay of 67 days, in filing the appeal which in our considered view has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
LPA No. of 2017 Admitted.
List in due course.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant/Applicant
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP.M/703/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court