Praveen Kumar v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2017 in CWP No.2449 of 2015 23.08.2017…
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the present application.
of 2017 in CWP No.2449 of 2015 23.08.2017…
Permission granted to withdraw the present application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.6577 of 2017 in CWP No.2449 of 2015
23.08.2017 Present:
Mr.B.C. Negi, Senior Advocate, with Mr.P.P. Singh, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr.Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner/nonapplicant.
Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate General and Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1.
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
CMP No.6577 of 2017
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application, reserving liberty to approach respondent-HRTC, venting out his grievances. Permission granted. Liberty reserved.
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Advocate, assures that on receipt of such representation, respondent authority shall expeditiously consider and decide the same, in accordance with law. Needless to add, if the order is not in favour of the applicant, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the applicant.
Accordingly, the application is disposed of as
withdrawn.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
applicant
respondent No.1
respondents No.2 and 3
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court