Disposed
Union of India v. Brahmi Devi and Others
Himachal Pradesh HCCMP.M/961/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2017 21.8.2017 Present Mr. Ashok Sharma…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2017 21.8.2017 Present Mr. Ashok Sharma…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No. 961 of 2017
Mr. H.R. Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan and Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, for respondents No.2 to 4.
CMP(M) No. 961 of 2017
Notice. Mr. H.R. Sidhu, Advocate waives notice on
behalf of respondent No.1. Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Additional Advocate General, waives notice on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4.
Heard. For the reasons set out in the application, delay of 194 days in filing appeal, which in our considered view, has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Appeal be registered.
LPA No. of 2017
List on 9.10.2017 .
CMPST No. 23762 of 2017
Notice in the aforesaid terms. Response to the application be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, within two weeks thereafter.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
August 21, 2017 (Vikrant)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 194 days in filing the appeal is condonable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
Respondent No.1
Respondents No.2 to 4
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court