The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Writ Petition No.2016 (Execution) by directing respondents to comply with earlier directions within six weeks, with an option to show cause in default.
Respondents directed to comply with directions dated 29.03.2012 within six weeks; report to Registrar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.178 of 2016
Date of decision: 01.12.2016
Purshotam Singh ..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & others . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Ms.Shalini Thakur, Proxy Counsel.
For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr.Anup Rattan & Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
Issue notice. Mr.J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate
General, waives notice on behalf of the respondents.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice December 1, 2016 ( Sandeep Sharma ) (tilak/vt) Judge
Purshotam Singh
State of H.P.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
