Respondents filed reply for CWP No.1688 of 2016, and the court accordingly disposed of the petition along with pending CMPs based on the reply content.
Petition disposed of along with pending CMPs pursuant to respondents' filed reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1688 of 2016 Decided on: 01.12.2016.
Jai Singh and others ………. Petitioners. versus The State of H.P. and others ……..Respondents. __________________________________________________________________ Coram_ The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Ms.Shalini Thakur, Proxy Counsel. For the Respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.Anup Rattan & Mr.Romesh Verma, Addl.A.Gs., and Mr.J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ____________________________________________________________ Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J. (Oral)
Respondents have filed the reply. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the reply filed by the respondents.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, alongwith pending
CMPs, if any, in terms of the reply filed by the respondents.
| (Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice. |
|
|---|---|
| December 01, 2016. | (Sandeep Sharma) |
| (Tilak) | Judge. |
Jai Singh and others
The State of H.P. and others
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
