The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of an execution petition filed by Rattan Chand as no substantive matter survived after the respondents filed a reply and passed a consideration order.
The execution petition is disposed of as nothing survives therein.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex.Pet. No.100 of 2016
Decided on: December 01, 2016 .
Rattan Chand ……….Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. and others …….Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Ms.Shalini Thakur, Proxy Counsel. For the Respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.Anup Rattan & Mr.Romesh Verma, Addl.A.Gs., and Mr.J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J. (Oral)
Mr.J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General, stated that the
respondents have filed the reply to the execution petition. It is further stated that the respondents have already passed the consideration order. Accordingly, nothing survives in the execution petition and the same is disposed of as such.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice.
1st December, 2016. (Sandeep Sharma) (Tilak) Judge
Rattan Chand
State of H.P.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
