The court allowed a compelling application filed by the parties as the underlying matter was compromised. The impugned judgment and decree were modified to reflect the compromise terms, which were found just, fair, and legal.
Application allowed; impugned judgment and decree modified; appeal disposed of as compromised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
RSA No. 333 of 2011
Date of Decision: 07.05.2015
Braham Dass …….Appellant.
Versus
Rattan Lal & another ….Respondents Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the Appellants : Mr. Rajinder Kanwar, Advocate.
For Respondents: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
RSA No.333 of 2011 & CMP No.4969 of 2015
Application being CMP No. 4969 of 2015
stands filed by the parties as the matter stands compromised. The compromise so arrived between the parties is annexed with the application as Annexure A-1 to A-3.
2
into between the parties are just, fair and legal. The compromise is also in favour of the parties as also in the interest of justice. Compromise is accepted so also the undertaking of the parties, who shall be bound by the same and have been made aware of the consequences of breach thereof.
Pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol),
Judge.
May 7, 2015 (Shankar)
Braham Dass
Rattan Lal
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
