Bachitar Ram v. Hpseb
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition; court disposed of the matter without prejudice to pending applications if any.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1254 of 2012-F. Decided on: May 7, 2015.
Bachiter Ram. …. Petitioner.
Versus
H.P.S.E.B. Ltd. & ors. ……… Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, J. Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the Petitioner | : Mr. |
Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondents | : Mr. |
Vivek Sharma, Advocate, vice |
| Mr. | Satyen Vaidya, Advocate, for | |
| resp | ondents No. 1 & 2. |
Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral)
Under instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present writ petition. As such, disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bachiter Ram
- respondent
H.P.S.E.B. Ltd.
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/1254/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court