In a writ petition, the court transmitted the record to the Himachal Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal pursuant to notifications and Section 29 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, directing parties to appear before the Tribunal on a specified date.
Record transmitted to the Registry of the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 10913 of 2012-B
08.05.2015 Present: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajpal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
In view of notifications No.G.S.R.926
(E) dated 29.12.2014 and No.Per(APB)B(15)4/2015 dated 25.03.2015, the matter requires to be adjudicated under the provisions of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. As such, in view of Section 29 of the said Act, record be transmitted to the Registry of the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, which now stands established.
Learned counsel for the parties undertake to communicate the order to their clients and appear before the Tribunal on 14.10.2015.
Registrar (Judicial) to take appropriate
action.
(Sanjay Karol), J.
May 8, 2015 (Purohit)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the matter requires adjudication under the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 and if so, transmission of record to the State Tribunal.
Whether the learned counsel's undertaking regarding future appearance before the Tribunal is sufficient.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
