Petitioner sought permission to withdraw execution petition due to objections filed by debtors; permission granted and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw petition granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Petition No. 9 of 2015
Decided on: 8th April, 2015
Lok Raj Saini
.......Petitioner.
Versus
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority and another.
...Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate.
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge (Oral)
In view of the judgment debtors have filed objections against the award sought to be executed in this petition, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the same at this stage. Permission granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
April 8, 2015 (Dharam Chand Chaudhary) (naveen) Judge
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Lok Raj Saini
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
