The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CMP(M) No. 1257 of 2014 in RSA No.______of 2015
Decided on: 7th April, 2015
Lajja Devi
.......Appellant.
Versus
Yash Pal and others
...Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the appellant: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents:
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel submits that as per
instructions he received over cellphone, the appellant is no more interested to prosecute this matter. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission granted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal and pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dismissed.
April 7, 2015 (Dharam Chand Chaudhary) (naveen) Judge
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Lajja Devi
Yash Pal and others
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
