Nek Ram v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court exercised jurisdiction under the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, deemed itself without authority to adjudicate the Civil Writ Petition, and transmitted the records to the Himachal Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal.
What did the court decide?
Records transmitted to the Registry of the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.567 of 2013-G
12.05.2015 Present: Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N.Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
In view of notifications No.G.S.R.926(E), dated 29.12.2014 and No. Per (AP-B)B(15)-4/2015 dated 25.3.2015, the matter requires to be adjudicated under the provisions of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. As such, in view of Section 29 of the said Act, record be transmitted to the Registry of the H.P.State Administrative Tribunal, which now stands established.
Learned counsel for the parties undertake to communicate the order to their clients and appear before the Tribunal on 29th October, 2015.
Registrar (Judicial) to take appropriate action.
May 12, 2015 (Sanjay Karol), J. (Shankar)
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/567/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court